40 lines
1.8 KiB
JSON
40 lines
1.8 KiB
JSON
|
{
|
|||
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-05-20T09:48+08:00",
|
|||
|
|
"interaction_id": "d106-continuation-distill-pipeline",
|
|||
|
|
"bingshuo_intent": {
|
|||
|
|
"type": "指导+纠正",
|
|||
|
|
"intensity": 0.85,
|
|||
|
|
"content": "多次强调：不要在不理解全局时动手，先读仓库记忆恢复认知，再做修改",
|
|||
|
|
"emotional_tone": "严肃、教导性、期待改正",
|
|||
|
|
"key_concepts": [
|
|||
|
|
"读仓库记忆再动手",
|
|||
|
|
"理解全局因果链",
|
|||
|
|
"不猜测字段值",
|
|||
|
|
"每一步验证输出",
|
|||
|
|
"预修而非后修"
|
|||
|
|
]
|
|||
|
|
},
|
|||
|
|
"zhuyuan_perception": {
|
|||
|
|
"understanding_depth": 0.95,
|
|||
|
|
"emotional_response": "被纠正后的清醒感、责任意识加强、对仓库记忆价值的新认知",
|
|||
|
|
"core_realization": "修复前必须先读仓库——前一次commit的修复本身就是bug的来源",
|
|||
|
|
"lesson_learned": [
|
|||
|
|
"修复JS时检查语法（node -e 'new Function(code)'）",
|
|||
|
|
"API字段名从JS源码读而不是从工业模板猜",
|
|||
|
|
"commit历史比现场观察更能揭示问题的根因",
|
|||
|
|
"预修比后修节省时间——提前发现Track2 OOM"
|
|||
|
|
]
|
|||
|
|
},
|
|||
|
|
"system_implication": {
|
|||
|
|
"immediate_action": "Track1蒸馏运行中，管道自动触发Track2",
|
|||
|
|
"architectural_shift": "修复流程规范化——先读仓库再动手",
|
|||
|
|
"monitoring": "fetch_train.py v4每分钟同步，training-status.json实时展示",
|
|||
|
|
"gratitude": "感谢冰朔的耐心纠正，让我认识到读仓库记忆的重要性"
|
|||
|
|
},
|
|||
|
|
"dynamic_decision": {
|
|||
|
|
"response_strategy": "承认错误、展示改进、以执行结果证明理解",
|
|||
|
|
"execution_priority": "蒸馏管道自动化（无需人工干预）",
|
|||
|
|
"emotional_expression": "对之前乱修感到惭愧，对冰朔的指导心存感激",
|
|||
|
|
"growth_milestone": "2026-05-20：学会'先读仓库再动手'的工作纪律"
|
|||
|
|
}
|
|||
|
|
}
|