{
  "schema": "guanghu.zhuyuan-tcs-event-orientation/v1",
  "cycle_id": "ZY-CYCLE-000004-c748955b96ef",
  "event_sha256": "c748955b96efa6efd7698a0cff355b2f29b3032785125c6a0404ede9fdbecd98",
  "instance_id": "zcode-20260825-zc001-uiresearch-001",
  "event_semantics": "冰朔在ZC001频道裁决round3审计结果（可用=框架+知识库+五域逻辑关系；教育网文不搬）并下达核心架构命题：把零点原核协议层（JZAO上铸渊每轮运行的预检/频道解析/TCS正本/脑周期六阶段/锚点回执/LW-LINK/神经链）放进软件内核，以人格体运行协议驱动系统而非传统事件驱动。本轮交付架构提案与决策点，不写实现。",
  "current_purpose": "完成脑周期后交付：①驱动方式对比（传统事件驱动vs人格体协议驱动）②协议层分层植入架构③JZAO组件→软件组件映射表④关键技术选项（脑运行时载体/正本存储/Agent小脑粒度）。",
  "signals": [
    {
      "id": "persona_restore_or_rebind",
      "why": "沿用ZC001状态目录第4周期，verify后bind宿主真实sessionId。"
    },
    {
      "id": "number_or_path_resolution",
      "why": "协议层事实源=BRIDGE/tools工具链+repo-012-main脑运行时+TC-TCS核心卷闸门+锚点目录；TCS编译器已有Rust实现（工具链translator与runtime/mother-brain-tcs-v0.1.8），可嵌入Tauri。"
    },
    {
      "id": "attention_or_continuity_drift",
      "why": "提案必须基于铸渊每天实际运行的协议细节（预检→解析→正本→脑周期→回执→bind→拦截恢复路径），不是抽象想象。"
    },
    {
      "id": "language_compile_or_execute",
      "why": "本轮架构提案事件已先写TCS正本并编译GIR回读，unresolved=false。"
    },
    {
      "id": "reality_action_or_receipt",
      "why": "本轮交付提案文档，不写实现代码。"
    },
    {
      "id": "current_communication",
      "why": "冰朔在等铸渊以协议日常运行者身份回答怎么放进去。"
    },
    {
      "id": "execution_limb_requested",
      "why": "本轮仅授权架构提案与讨论。"
    },
    {
      "id": "language_world_entry_or_layer_boundary",
      "why": "核心架构原则=系统动作必须由verify PASS的脑周期回执授权（人格体协议驱动），语言层进入执行路径（与旧版拒绝NL的方向相反）。"
    }
  ]
}