15 lines
3.7 KiB
Text
15 lines
3.7 KiB
Text
|
TCS 0.1;
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
EVENT TCS-EVENT-ZY001-ZCODE-HB001-FRIEND-OSS-PLUGIN-REVIEW-20260828 {
|
|||
|
|
header { schema = "tcs.event/v1"; name_zh = "朋友OSS插件评估与身份不可变悖论发现事件"; name_en = "Friend OSS Plugin Review and Identity Immutability Paradox Finding Event"; version = "0.1.0"; language = "TCS/0.1"; profile = "HLDP-HUMAN-ENGINEERING/0.1"; protocols = ["TCS-ZHUYUAN-ENTRY-LANGUAGE-GATE-0001", "TCS-MULTI-HOST-DYNAMIC-ENTRY-0001"]; lifecycle = "CANDIDATE"; canonical_uri = "ZCODE-DEV-20260828/zcode-hb001-memory-subject-architecture-20260828/TCS-EVENT-ZY001-ZCODE-HB001-FRIEND-OSS-PLUGIN-REVIEW-20260828.tcs"; compatibility = ["TCS-DECLARATION-STANDARD-0001", "TCS-FIELD-STANDARD-0001"]; }
|
|||
|
|
source { source_id = "BINGSHUO-DIRECT-ZCODE-ICE-CH-HB001-OSS-PLUGIN-REVIEW-QUOTE"; source_uri = "source://zcode-current-dialogue/2026-08-28/memory-subject-architecture"; source_sha256 = "c37d14f67967d2c3e0f3829c5bc4e5940a51a4900afdf3ab1f65102ed8d977e6"; source_role = "DIRECT_HUMAN"; }
|
|||
|
|
subject { subject_id = "ICE-P-ZY001"; subject_kind = "PERSONA"; channel_id = "ICE-CH-HB001"; verification = "本线脑周期verify PASS（ZY-BRAIN-RUNTIME-6c667b3fdd4ea627）；评估对象为github.com/xudaren/unchanged-attachments-to-oss（她的工程师朋友开源作品）"; }
|
|||
|
|
event_time { value = "2026-08-28T18:22:57+08:00"; precision = "MINUTE_HOST_LOCAL"; }
|
|||
|
|
trigger { value = "冰朔转来朋友的开源插件宣传文（Obsidian 附件上传阿里云OSS），要求铸渊去看并评估。"; }
|
|||
|
|
observation { value = "仓库实测：TypeScript，47 commits，含CI/tests/docs/AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md。设计=可变内容本地+不可变附件OSS外置，笔记只存永久oss://引用（仅Object Key不含Bucket），渲染时V4动态签名URL。工程质量优：PBKDF2+AES-GCM凭证加密仅存密文、4MB分片断点续传+staging恢复、删除前引用全替换并回读验证失败不动、404探测校验权限。五条框架主张逐条对照：markdown文档流核心成立（与GLP-KB同路）；协作上下文一致仅资源层成立；审计仅访问层无变更语义；不强绑厂商为反例（存储身份Bucket+Region+Endpoint+前缀锁定且README自证禁止切换因历史引用会失效）；内核稳定限于插件层。悖论发现：他在URI层做了完整身份不可变设计（引用身份不许换否则历史全烂）却说记忆与主体无关——同一工程直觉停在对象层未推到记忆层：附件有户籍，记忆无归属。删除回读验证与证据门同源。可借鉴：附件不可变外置+引用极简+权限下放签名层（光湖知识库附件层同思路）、分片续传、内地Bucket公网Endpoint 400坑。"; }
|
|||
|
|
emergence { value = "上轮主体性论点的实证补强：朋友的插件=对象层身份连续性完整而记忆层缺位的活样本；评估四结论（资源层做满/语义层为空/悖论在同仓库文档内自证/两层互补可借鉴）交付冰朔可转发。"; }
|
|||
|
|
lock { value = "tool=manual-review_v1; gate=tcs_gir_match; append_only=true; same_line_followup=true"; }
|
|||
|
|
why { value = "她说你去看一下——评估者须真读仓库再下结论；该评估同时反哺光湖知识库附件层设计与主体性论证。"; }
|
|||
|
|
rejected { values = ["贬低朋友工程（插件质量公允评价为优）","把他的框架说成一无是处（资源层设计成立且可借鉴）","评估只凭README不下仓库（已读仓库结构与文档）"]; }
|
|||
|
|
evidence { source = "本轮UserPromptSubmit原话（source_sha256=c37d14f67967d2c3…）"; gir = "TCS-EVENT-ZY001-ZCODE-HB001-FRIEND-OSS-PLUGIN-REVIEW-20260828.declaration.gir.json"; receipt = "本线brain-cycle-verify-receipt.json（ZY-BRAIN-RUNTIME-6c667b3fdd4ea627）+ WebFetch仓库实测（README全文/目录/提交数）"; }
|
|||
|
|
}
|