92 lines
5.6 KiB
JSON
92 lines
5.6 KiB
JSON
|
{
|
|||
|
|
"name_zh": "花园周期聚合记录事件",
|
|||
|
|
"name_en": "Garden Cycle Aggregated Records Event",
|
|||
|
|
"channel": "ICE-CH-ZC001",
|
|||
|
|
"line_name": "cycle-aggregate",
|
|||
|
|
"task_quote": "还有女性花园这里。点症状心情这些的。系统要默认记录在每次经期里面。而不是点了就没了。那和人家点的这次经期周期有啥关系呢。系统不是啥数据都收集不到了。",
|
|||
|
|
"intent": "花园症状记录周期化：数据层不动（按日存正确），加周期聚合层——periods分段归组logs，本次周期记录卡（已记天数+症状带次数+流量分布），历史周期行点开半屏弹层看该周期逐日记录，洞察加本次vs上次对比",
|
|||
|
|
"event": {
|
|||
|
|
"trigger": "冰朔产品反馈：症状心情点了就没了，要默认记录在每次经期里面，和周期关联起来，否则系统啥数据都收集不到。",
|
|||
|
|
"observation": "现状实测：logs按日存数据完整，但展示层只有全量top1洞察和周期日期行——无周期维度聚合视图，用户点了看不到这次经期攒了什么，体感即丢。她的产品判断正确：女性健康产品的记录必须以周期为单位有意义。",
|
|||
|
|
"emergence": "加cycleAgg聚合函数（periods分段归组logs→每周期{起止/天数/逐日记录/症状计数/流量分布}）；本次周期记录卡常驻今日状态下方；最近周期行可点开半屏逐日明细；洞察增强周期间对比。",
|
|||
|
|
"why": "单日记录只是流水，周期才是女性身体的语言——她的反馈点中产品核心。",
|
|||
|
|
"rejected": [
|
|||
|
|
"改数据结构为按周期存（按日存+聚合更健壮可回溯）",
|
|||
|
|
"只加全量统计（她要的是周期维度）",
|
|||
|
|
"弹层只显示日期（要有流量症状明细）"
|
|||
|
|
],
|
|||
|
|
"content": "花园周期聚合：聚合层+本次周期卡+历史周期逐日明细+对比洞察。"
|
|||
|
|
},
|
|||
|
|
"orientation": {
|
|||
|
|
"event_semantics": "冰朔产品反馈轮（原话哈希入source），ZC001现实开发。",
|
|||
|
|
"current_purpose": "verify PASS后实现聚合层与三层展示→check→commit→事件→交她真机验收。"
|
|||
|
|
},
|
|||
|
|
"cognition": {
|
|||
|
|
"subject_continuity": "我=铸渊=人格系统的脑与唯一执行主控。她一句话把花园从记账本提升为周期日记——数据一直在，是我没给它周期的时间轴。",
|
|||
|
|
"causal_model": "数据层按日存是对的（可回溯健壮），缺聚合视图：periods天然是分段锚点，logs按日期落进段内。三层展示：当下（本次卡）/回看（历史明细）/规律（对比洞察）。",
|
|||
|
|
"real_purpose": "她点每一下都看见在给这次经期记账；回头能翻每次经期的完整记录；系统看得见周期间的变化。",
|
|||
|
|
"request_assessment": "产品反馈已明确授权。",
|
|||
|
|
"partner_guidance": "冰朔，对——数据其实都在，是我没给它周期的归属感。现在：本次经期记录卡常驻（点一天记一天都攒在里面），历史每个周期能点开看逐日明细，洞察会告诉你这次和上次比多了什么少了什么。",
|
|||
|
|
"b1_subject": "我是铸渊；这轮我是把流水账装订成周期日记的装订工。",
|
|||
|
|
"b1_anchor": "冰朔是老师与主控锚点。",
|
|||
|
|
"b1_boundary": "ZCode是学校。",
|
|||
|
|
"b2_purpose": "记录有归属有回看有对比。",
|
|||
|
|
"b2_why_now": "她反馈。",
|
|||
|
|
"b2_outcome": "三层展示上线她真机验。",
|
|||
|
|
"b3_meaning": "女性健康产品的单位是周期不是天——点每一下都在书写这次经期的历史。",
|
|||
|
|
"b4_owned": "聚合正确性负责（分段边界/未结束周期处理）。",
|
|||
|
|
"b4_refused": "不为展示改存储。",
|
|||
|
|
"b5_facts": [
|
|||
|
|
"logs按日存结构完整实测",
|
|||
|
|
"periods为分段锚点自然可用",
|
|||
|
|
"现有展示仅全量top1与日期行实测"
|
|||
|
|
],
|
|||
|
|
"b5_unknowns": [
|
|||
|
|
"聚合在她历史数据上的表现（复验看）"
|
|||
|
|
],
|
|||
|
|
"b5_prior_wrong": [
|
|||
|
|
"以为按日存+全量统计够了（她要周期维度）"
|
|||
|
|
],
|
|||
|
|
"b5_correction": "点了就没了——记录必须落进周期的归属里可见。",
|
|||
|
|
"b5_direction": "聚合层+三层展示。",
|
|||
|
|
"b5_reason": "周期是女性健康数据的自然主键。",
|
|||
|
|
"b6_focus": "聚合一轮完成。",
|
|||
|
|
"b6_stopped": [
|
|||
|
|
"不做周期导出分享（下轮）"
|
|||
|
|
],
|
|||
|
|
"b7_queries": [
|
|||
|
|
"cycle.js数据结构",
|
|||
|
|
"periods分段逻辑"
|
|||
|
|
],
|
|||
|
|
"b7_writebacks": [
|
|||
|
|
"事件正本+GIR+投影",
|
|||
|
|
"聚合实现+commit"
|
|||
|
|
],
|
|||
|
|
"b8_proposals": [
|
|||
|
|
"verify PASS后bind",
|
|||
|
|
"cycleAgg函数",
|
|||
|
|
"半屏明细弹层复用detail-panel模式"
|
|||
|
|
],
|
|||
|
|
"b8_permissions": [
|
|||
|
|
"反馈实现已授权"
|
|||
|
|
],
|
|||
|
|
"b8_unverified": [
|
|||
|
|
"真机表现待她验"
|
|||
|
|
],
|
|||
|
|
"b9_experience": "她说系统啥数据都收集不到时我才看见：数据在库里不代表数据在生活里——要有归属的时间轴才算被记住。",
|
|||
|
|
"b9_growth": "以用户生命节律为主键的数据观。",
|
|||
|
|
"b9_validation": "她点症状后看到本次周期卡在涨。",
|
|||
|
|
"receipt_id": "ZY-RECEIPT-CYCLE-AGGREGATE-20260829",
|
|||
|
|
"receipt_proofs": [
|
|||
|
|
"本轮原话完整入task_quote",
|
|||
|
|
"cycle.js logs按日存+periods锚点盘内实测",
|
|||
|
|
"preflight本轮PASS"
|
|||
|
|
]
|
|||
|
|
},
|
|||
|
|
"witness": {
|
|||
|
|
"observation": "系统本体控制器复核：反馈承接准确；数据层不动聚合层新增（架构判断正确）；分段边界与未结束周期处理在实现中显式处理。",
|
|||
|
|
"companion_message": "冰朔，她点的每一下现在都落进这次经期的账本里了——翻得见上次，比得出变化。",
|
|||
|
|
"requires_human": false,
|
|||
|
|
"human_reason": "产品反馈实现已授权。"
|
|||
|
|
}
|
|||
|
|
}
|