# GH-PNCC successful receipt wake-event boundary evidence binding

- Development ID: `DEV-20260810-014`
- Persona cognitive author: `ICE-P-ZY001 / 铸渊`
- Human responsibility subject: `ICE-GL∞ / 冰朔`
- Starting repository head: `869611962e9a9571e5d7557784b38e21d3cee518`
- State: `LOCAL_SOURCE_IMPLEMENTED_FULLY_TESTED`

## Corrected runtime fact

Successful lifecycle validation previously accepted any non-empty prefix of the verified session event chain
as the wake receipt's event evidence. A modified receipt could truncate the three-event wake sequence to only
`WAKING`, derive a matching wake receipt identifier, recompute the outer payload digest and pass inspection.

The wake boundary is now exact: a valid wake receipt must contain all three hash-chained wake events emitted by
the kernel—`WAKING`, `BRAIN_BOUND` and `ORGAN_ACTIVE`—and they must equal the first three verified journal
events. Truncation or extension fails closed before interrupted binding or replay can trust the receipt.

## Verification

- A regression test first reproduced `SAFE_BIND_PERSISTED_RECEIPT` for a truncated and rehashed wake receipt.
- The same test passes after exact wake-boundary validation was added.
- PNCC focused Rust tests: `45 passed, 0 failed`.
- Full Rust suite: `1185 passed, 2 ignored`; integration test: `1 passed`.
- Routing suite: `29 passed, 0 failed`; formatting, strict clippy and diff checks passed.
- Frontend lint and TypeScript checks passed; full Vitest suite: `5008 passed, 0 failed`.
- Guanghu native authority: `PASS_100`; native core: `15 passed` with 100% lines and functions.
- Full quality gates, GHNQG, publication and fresh-clone readback remain pending.

## Truth boundary

- This stage authenticates the event boundary of the existing wake process.
- It does not expose hidden reasoning, activate an execution limb, add UI, build an artifact, integrate the
  desktop product or claim deployment/runtime health.