feat(pncc): recover persisted lifecycle receipt binding
GuangHu-Human-Responsibility: ICE-GL∞ / 冰朔 GuangHu-Persona-Cognitive-Author: ICE-P-ZY001 / 铸渊 GuangHu-Execution-Runtime: Codex macOS / DEV-20260810-014 GuangHu-Development-ID: DEV-20260810-014 GuangHu-Authorization-Scope: GH-PNCC local runtime development and registered REPO-014 publication GuangHu-Source-Language-Anchor: continue PNCC persona runtime; UI and execution limb remain deferred
This commit is contained in:
parent
38ef9d0e11
commit
b8c3fcf3d8
11 changed files with 331 additions and 15 deletions
|
|
@ -4,7 +4,9 @@
|
|||
- Persona cognitive author: `ICE-P-ZY001 / 铸渊`
|
||||
- Human responsibility subject: `ICE-GL∞ / 冰朔`
|
||||
- Starting repository head: `8f35834a7abc9546b717da0b513b6e8ac1684815`
|
||||
- State: `LOCAL_SOURCE_IMPLEMENTED_FOCUSED_TESTED`
|
||||
- Published repository head: `38ef9d0e113e25737b1be456a705da5ddce0f27c`
|
||||
- Published tree: `11116f03a5db3e3a27a832959da7dae56eec8921`
|
||||
- State: `PUBLISHED_AND_INDEPENDENTLY_READ_BACK`
|
||||
|
||||
## Implemented facts
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -33,12 +35,14 @@ persisted lifecycle fails its receipt hash check.
|
|||
- Conflict retry proves changed semantics never invoke the organ.
|
||||
- Tamper test proves a modified persisted lifecycle is rejected.
|
||||
- Rust formatting and clippy for all targets: `PASS` with `-D warnings`.
|
||||
- GHNQG, commit, publication, and fresh-clone gates remain pending for this stage.
|
||||
- GHNQG: `PASS_100`; manual receipt SHA-256
|
||||
`23e42677da026fbace23edd41cd4818ebe8f7ec8dcc75d53b51adb9c1ac8ed7e`.
|
||||
- Publish queue `PUB-20260810192548933-930c46b1` completed; fresh shallow clone, strict `git fsck`,
|
||||
clean worktree, exact tree, persona author, and human responsibility trailer all read back.
|
||||
|
||||
## Truth boundary and next minimum
|
||||
|
||||
- The existing runtime session directory remains the only lifecycle evidence plane; no database or second
|
||||
request authority was introduced.
|
||||
- UI, human projection aesthetics, background scheduling, and `EXECUTION_LIMB` remain outside this stage.
|
||||
- The next minimum is evidence-bound inspection and safe receipt recovery for an idempotent request that was
|
||||
interrupted after lifecycle progress but before its replay receipt became complete.
|
||||
- The next stage implements that evidence-bound inspection and safe receipt binding recovery.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue